The Internet of Things revolution: wake-up call for corporates and politicians

Why are today’s senior - and not so senior - decision takers, whether business leaders or politicians, so seemingly unaware of the fast approaching third revolution in Internet access - the Internet of Things?

It is probably because the Internet of Things is the culmination of countless mini-developments creeping up all around us. Among these are the ever smarter mobile phones and the amazing things they can do, the increasingly clever applications of RFID codes, QL codes, facial and gait recognition, tele-medicine, steps towards smart utility metering, Oyster card introduction, car number plate recognition - the list goes on and on.

Right now these are relative silos of activity making an impact by bringing new capabilities and efficiencies to daily life and business. With interoperable standards all these silos will be able to interconnect and intercommunicate. And that’s what the Internet of Things is about.

The Internet of Things goes beyond the millions and millions of machine to machine activity currently conducted via the Internet, with for example mobile phone apps. It is about the billions and billions of tiny chips that’ll flood the world over the next ten years. It’s about those tiny chips being programmable, trackable, findable, and uniquely identified, and with the sensing capabilities currently on mobile phones and more.

The Internet of Things is about the capability of every object - whether a toothbrush or a building - embedded with such chips to have a unique identifier, and, using its sensing, processing and communications capabilities to intercommunicate with its environment, other objects and living things - and, eventually ending up able to make autonomous decisions.

There’ll be major business and social ramifications, opportunities and threats as a result.

smartercities:

What Exactly Is A Smart City? | Co.Exist
Having worked in the smart cities space for several years now, I am encouraged by the growth of the sector and the pace of technological advancements being developed for urban environments. However, I believe that the smart-cities movement is being held back by a lack of clarity and consensus around what a smart city is and what the components of a smart city actually are.
While some people continue to take a narrow view of smart cities by seeing them as places that make better use of information and communication technology (ICT), the cities I work with (and most of the participants in the #smartchat, a monthly Twitterchat about smart cities held on the first Wednesday of each month) all view smart cities as a broad, integrated approach to improving the efficiency of city operations, the quality of life for its citizens, and growing the local economy.
Later this year, I’ll publish my annual rankings of smart cities here on Co.Exist. In order to improve them, I have been working on a new rubric for smart cities, that I call the Smart Cities Wheel.

smartercities:

What Exactly Is A Smart City? | Co.Exist

Having worked in the smart cities space for several years now, I am encouraged by the growth of the sector and the pace of technological advancements being developed for urban environments. However, I believe that the smart-cities movement is being held back by a lack of clarity and consensus around what a smart city is and what the components of a smart city actually are.

While some people continue to take a narrow view of smart cities by seeing them as places that make better use of information and communication technology (ICT), the cities I work with (and most of the participants in the #smartchat, a monthly Twitterchat about smart cities held on the first Wednesday of each month) all view smart cities as a broad, integrated approach to improving the efficiency of city operations, the quality of life for its citizens, and growing the local economy.

Later this year, I’ll publish my annual rankings of smart cities here on Co.Exist. In order to improve them, I have been working on a new rubric for smart cities, that I call the Smart Cities Wheel.

Social-Media Insights Inspired By America’s First Truly Social President | Fast Company
No politician in history has leveraged social media to the extent of President Obama. Here’s how his administration stays ahead of the curve—and what you can learn about effective social brand-building from the Tweep-in-Chief.

Social-Media Insights Inspired By America’s First Truly Social President | Fast Company

No politician in history has leveraged social media to the extent of President Obama. Here’s how his administration stays ahead of the curve—and what you can learn about effective social brand-building from the Tweep-in-Chief.

(via futuristgerd)

Building a Smarter Malaga | Citizen IBM Blog


The IBM Smarter Cities Challenge has reinforced and contributed to the goals of the Málaga II Strategic Plan, whose strong commitment with the Technology has allowed the City to make a significant progress towards a Smart City in different citizen services in the last years. Working with IBM’s Smarter Cities team, the objective was to create a framework for a sustainable economy by developing actionable recommendations to enhance our competitiveness. These include:

  • Creating a measurable economic strategy
  • Enhancing public-private collaboration
  • Reinforcing Málaga’s branding strategy
  • Making better use of open data
DARPA and NIH to fund ‘human body on a chip’ research | KurzweilAI
MIT-led team to receive up to $32 million from DARPA and NIH to develop technology that could accelerate pace and efficiency of pharmaceutical testing 
Researchers in the Department of Biological Engineering at MIT plan to develop a technology platform that will mimic human physiological systems in the laboratory, using an array of integrated, interchangeable engineered human tissue constructs, with $32 million funding over the next five years from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
A cooperative agreement between MIT and DARPA worth up to $26.3 million will be used to establish a new program titled “Barrier-Immune-Organ: MIcrophysiology, Microenvironment Engineered TIssue Construct Systems” (BIO-MIMETICS) at MIT, in collaboration with researchers at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, MatTek Corp. and Zyoxel Ltd.

DARPA and NIH to fund ‘human body on a chip’ research | KurzweilAI

MIT-led team to receive up to $32 million from DARPA and NIH to develop technology that could accelerate pace and efficiency of pharmaceutical testing 

Researchers in the Department of Biological Engineering at MIT plan to develop a technology platform that will mimic human physiological systems in the laboratory, using an array of integrated, interchangeable engineered human tissue constructs, with $32 million funding over the next five years from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).

A cooperative agreement between MIT and DARPA worth up to $26.3 million will be used to establish a new program titled “Barrier-Immune-Organ: MIcrophysiology, Microenvironment Engineered TIssue Construct Systems” (BIO-MIMETICS) at MIT, in collaboration with researchers at the Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, MatTek Corp. and Zyoxel Ltd.

Who invented the Internet?: The outrageous conservative claim that every tech innovation came from private enterprise. - Slate Magazine


Earlier this month, President Obama argued that wealthy business people owe some of their success to the government’s investment in education and basic infrastructure. He cited roads, bridges, and schools. Then he singled out the most clear-cut example of how government investment can spark huge business opportunities: the Internet.




“The Internet didn’t get invented on its own,” Obama said. “Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”




Until recently this wouldn’t have been a controversial statement. Everyone in the tech world knows that the Internet got its start in the 1960s, when a team of computing pioneers at the Pentagon’s Advanced Research Projects Agency designed and deployed ARPANET, the first computer network that used “packet switching”—a communications system that splits up data and sends it across multiple paths toward its destination, which is the basic design of today’s Internet. According to most accounts, researchers working on ARPANET created many of the Internet’s defining features, including TCP/IP, the protocol on which today’s network operates. In the 1980s, they strung together various government and university networks together using TCP/IP—thus creating a single worldwide network, the Internet.



Suddenly, though, the government’s role in the Internet’s creation is being cast into doubt. “It’s an urban legend that the government launched the Internet,” Gordon Crovitz, the former publisher of the Wall Street Journal,argued Monday in a widely linkedJournal op-ed. Instead, Crovitz believes that “full credit” for the Internet’s creation ought to go to Xerox, whose Silicon Valley research facility, Xerox PARC, created the Ethernet networking standard as well as the first graphical computer (famously the inspiration for Apple’s Mac). According to Crovitz, not only did the government not create the Internet, it slowed its arrival—that researchers were hassled by “bureaucrats” who stymied the network’s success.




“It’s important to understand the history of the Internet because it’s too often wrongly cited to justify big government,” Crovitz says. I’ll give him one thing: It is important to understand the history of the Internet. Too bad he doesn’t seem interested in doing so.




Crovitz’s entire yarn is almost hysterically false. He gets basic history wrong, he gets the Internet’s defining technologies wrong, and, most importantly, he misses the important interplay between public and private funds that has been necessary for all great modern technological advances.

Who invented the Internet?: The outrageous conservative claim that every tech innovation came from private enterprise. - Slate Magazine

Earlier this month, President Obama argued that wealthy business people owe some of their success to the government’s investment in education and basic infrastructure. He cited roads, bridges, and schools. Then he singled out the most clear-cut example of how government investment can spark huge business opportunities: the Internet.

“The Internet didn’t get invented on its own,” Obama said. “Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.”

Until recently this wouldn’t have been a controversial statement. Everyone in the tech world knows that the Internet got its start in the 1960s, when a team of computing pioneers at the Pentagon’s Advanced Research Projects Agency designed and deployed ARPANET, the first computer network that used “packet switching”—a communications system that splits up data and sends it across multiple paths toward its destination, which is the basic design of today’s Internet. According to most accounts, researchers working on ARPANET created many of the Internet’s defining features, including TCP/IP, the protocol on which today’s network operates. In the 1980s, they strung together various government and university networks together using TCP/IP—thus creating a single worldwide network, the Internet.

Suddenly, though, the government’s role in the Internet’s creation is being cast into doubt. “It’s an urban legend that the government launched the Internet,” Gordon Crovitz, the former publisher of the Wall Street Journal,argued Monday in a widely linkedJournal op-ed. Instead, Crovitz believes that “full credit” for the Internet’s creation ought to go to Xerox, whose Silicon Valley research facility, Xerox PARC, created the Ethernet networking standard as well as the first graphical computer (famously the inspiration for Apple’s Mac). According to Crovitz, not only did the government not create the Internet, it slowed its arrival—that researchers were hassled by “bureaucrats” who stymied the network’s success.

“It’s important to understand the history of the Internet because it’s too often wrongly cited to justify big government,” Crovitz says. I’ll give him one thing: It is important to understand the history of the Internet. Too bad he doesn’t seem interested in doing so.

Crovitz’s entire yarn is almost hysterically false. He gets basic history wrong, he gets the Internet’s defining technologies wrong, and, most importantly, he misses the important interplay between public and private funds that has been necessary for all great modern technological advances.

Augmented reality growing popular with U.S. military - QR Code Press
The practical applications of augmented reality are gaining more attention, however, especially amongst military and security organizations. A new report from Mind Commerce, a research organization, shows that augmented reality is, indeed, becoming a popular topic within the U.S. military. 

Augmented reality growing popular with U.S. military - QR Code Press

The practical applications of augmented reality are gaining more attention, however, especially amongst military and security organizations. A new report from Mind Commerce, a research organization, shows that augmented reality is, indeed, becoming a popular topic within the U.S. military. 

Navy’s new ‘UFO’ completes first phase of testing.The X-47B unmanned fighter jet caused a stir as it was being transported to Maryland, with locals thinking they’d seen a UFO. In fact, the new jet is undergoing trials in an effort to become the first unmanned vehicle to complete a takeoff and landing from an aircraft carrier - all completely autonomously.
The first round of testing saw the jet climbing to 15,000 feet, before returning for multiple maneuvers including extending a tail hook on landing, which will be used to stop on the aircraft carrier. After a second phase of testing in Maryland, the Navy hopes to have it operating on an aircraft carrier in 2013. Because the takeoff and landings will all be completely controlled by the computers in the aircraft, the Navy will only have to focus on plotting out preprogrammed missions for the jet.
It’s also planned to begin testing of airbourne refuelling of the jet sometime in 2014.

Navy’s new ‘UFO’ completes first phase of testing.
The X-47B unmanned fighter jet caused a stir as it was being transported to Maryland, with locals thinking they’d seen a UFO. In fact, the new jet is undergoing trials in an effort to become the first unmanned vehicle to complete a takeoff and landing from an aircraft carrier - all completely autonomously.

The first round of testing saw the jet climbing to 15,000 feet, before returning for multiple maneuvers including extending a tail hook on landing, which will be used to stop on the aircraft carrier. After a second phase of testing in Maryland, the Navy hopes to have it operating on an aircraft carrier in 2013. Because the takeoff and landings will all be completely controlled by the computers in the aircraft, the Navy will only have to focus on plotting out preprogrammed missions for the jet.

It’s also planned to begin testing of airbourne refuelling of the jet sometime in 2014.

(via 8bitfuture)

 New “Better Streets” Website Helps Residents Untangle City Bureaucracy | Streetsblog San Francisco
The San Francisco Better Streets Program launched a new website this week to provide a central source of information to help residents procure street improvements like traffic-calming measures, parklets, bike corrals, plantings, art installations, sidewalk fixtures, and permits for car-free events in their neighborhood.
The website, sfbetterstreets.org, “combines all the city’s guidelines, permit requirements, and resources for public space development onto one site, giving the user a handy step-by-step approach toward improving San Francisco’s streets,” the Planning Department said in a release.
Launched as a collaboration of the Planning Department, Department of Public Works, SF Public Utilities Commission, and the SFMTA, the site should help spread awareness of the street improvements available to residents and guide them through the city’s bureaucratic processes.

 New “Better Streets” Website Helps Residents Untangle City Bureaucracy | Streetsblog San Francisco

The San Francisco Better Streets Program launched a new website this week to provide a central source of information to help residents procure street improvements like traffic-calming measures, parklets, bike corrals, plantings, art installations, sidewalk fixtures, and permits for car-free events in their neighborhood.

The website, sfbetterstreets.org, “combines all the city’s guidelines, permit requirements, and resources for public space development onto one site, giving the user a handy step-by-step approach toward improving San Francisco’s streets,” the Planning Department said in a release.

Launched as a collaboration of the Planning Department, Department of Public Works, SF Public Utilities Commission, and the SFMTA, the site should help spread awareness of the street improvements available to residents and guide them through the city’s bureaucratic processes.